NEWBERRY COUNTY COUNCIL

MINUTES

FEBRUARY 24, 2006

 

The Newberry County Council met on Friday, February 24, 2006, at 2:30 P.M. in Council Chambers for a special called meeting.

 

Present:            Mike Hawkins, Chairman

                        William D. Waldrop, Vice-Chairman

                        John E. Caldwell, Councilman

                        Henry B. Summer, Councilman

                        John David Dawkins, Councilman

                        Andy Morris, Councilman

                        Edgar Baker, Councilman

                        J.E. Klugh, Acting County Administrator

                        Gary T. Pope, County Attorney

                        Susan C. Fellers, Clerk to Council

 

Media:              Heather Hawkins, WKDK

                        Cindy Pitts, Newberry Observer

                        No representation from Whitmire News

 

Mr. Hawkins called the meeting to order and determined a quorum to be present.

 

Mr. Waldrop had the invocation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.

 

Additions, Deletions and Adoption of Agenda:

 

Mr. Dawkins requested the addition of the following items:

1.         Carter Goble Lee regarding Capital Sales Tax Projects.  (Agenda Item #1.1)

            2.         Supplemental funding for fire stations.  (Agenda Item #1.2)

 

There being no further additions or deletions, Mr. Morris moved to adopt the agenda as amended; second by Mr. Dawkins.  Voting for the motion:  Councilmen Hawkins, Waldrop, Summer, Dawkins, Morris and Baker.  Mr. Caldwell did not vote.  Motion passed by majority vote.

 

1.         An Ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of a Newberry County, South Carolina, Special Source Revenue Bond (Industrial Park Projects), Series 2006, in the principal amount of $6,410,000; the application of the proceeds of said bonds to defray, for economic development purposes, the costs of certain infrastructure improvements and of acquiring certain property in Newberry County; and other matters relating thereto.

 

            Mr. Morris moved for third reading; second by Mr. Waldrop. 

 

            Mr. Pope reviewed the following amendments:

 

When Council originally considered this Ordinance, it was for a $9,000,000 bond issue, which could have been issued in a series, and also allowed the County to mortgage the property.  Since then, the scope of the project has been more focused.  We have gotten commitment on the money.  Negotiations have reduced the amount from $9,000,000 to $6,410,000.  We have deleted the provisions of series bonds down to a single bond and deleted the provision allowing mortgaging of the property.  BB&T gave us a bank qualified tax exempt rate of 3.99% fixed for the first 10 years and then readjusted.  The scope of the project has been identified with more particularity.  It allows for an Industrial Park at the intersection of I-26 and Highway 773 and also to make necessary park improvements or acquisitions at the existing Industrial Park at Highway 219 if there is money available.  The money that is used comes from the Fee in Lieu of Taxes stream.  The entire stream is pledged, but it has been specified that it automatically comes from Newberry County’s share first before the school’s share would ever be touched.  If there is a shortfall, then the school’s money would be the back-up.  County Council has a right to direct otherwise, but that would have to be done on an annual basis by March 18th.  The way it is set up the Treasurer would let the County’s share, as she calculates it, make these bond payments. 

 

There are technical changes to comply with this.  We don’t have bond anticipation notes provided for any more. 

 

Mr. Hawkins clarified that as long as the County’s Fee in Lieu is adequate to make the payments on the bonds, we would not touch the school money, and if we have to touch the school’s money, we could take other action to Make them whole at that time.  Mr. Pope advised that was correct.  A subsequent County Council would have the legal right to take the fee payments off the top if they took a formal vote to do that but the way it is set up now is that it automatically comes out of the County’s share first before the school’s money would be touched. 

 

Mr. Waldrop asked if real estate agents were involved in this transaction.  Mr. Pope advised that real estate agents were involved in the sale of the property the County is considering buying.  The private land owners engaged real estate agents; not the County.  The County does not have a contract with anybody at this time.  That is one of the things to be considered. 

 

Mr. Pope advised the way the contracts were written up, they provide the buyer would pay a commission of $172,950 for all of the land.  The County would not buy all of the property so it would be approximately $30,000 less than that.  This is the way the contracts were drawn up, and the County had no input as to how they were done.  They were done in such a way to provide for a buyer’s premium, where the buyer would pay the commission instead of the seller.  The seller may be paying a commission, too, that we don’t know about. 

 

Mr. Waldrop stated the land on Highway 34 where the Public Works Department is would soon be freed up for economic development so we are going to buy land, pay a commission for it and get in the real estate business, and we already have land. 

 

Mr. Pope advised that if the County should sell property in the future, it could draw up the proposal in such a way that the buyer would have to pay the commission. 

 

Mr. Waldrop asked if we had any hits, and asked that Teresa Powers, Planning Director, come forward.  Mr. Waldrop asked Ms. Powers if she had anybody obligated to buy the land yet if the County purchased it. 

 

Ms. Powers indicated she did not.  Right now that would have to be negotiated with the private land owners.  The County has no control to negotiate that property at this point.  There is nobody locked down for this property at this time.  We have shown it.  Part of the property has been in our industrial inventory but we haven’t shown it in that capacity.  There is no formal commitment yet.    

 

Mr. Waldrop stated he was involved in a meeting with Ms. Powers, Leonard Sossamon and the Newberry Electric Cooperative.  His understanding was that we were trying to get other people involved in the project.  Mr. Waldrop asked if we had anybody involved in the project besides the County.  Ms. Powers stated not to her knowledge. 

 

Mr. Waldrop stated we were speculating and had nobody to purchase it at this time.  Ms. Powers stated that was the purpose for the whole industrial site facility study.  More and more companies want property that is ready to go and unless you have control of the property, projects are coming through with a two to three month window as far as wanting to get on the ground and build and get up and running.  Newberry County does not have any property that is at that point that we can sell and move quickly on.  We have some private owners of property that could be available industrial development, but not as far as getting it to a park status similar to what we have on Highway 219 with signage, lighting and roads.  When industrial customers come in, they want to see what the environment is going to look like. 

 

Mr. Waldrop advised that with the Highway 219 property, people were looking for property at the time.  When the County made that deal, we knew that companies were coming.  Then we put the infrastructure in and we recouped that money in a hurry. 

 

Mr. Waldrop felt we were gambling very strongly with the economy like it is.  The real estate market is going south, and we don’t want to risk the taxpayers’ money and not have anybody out there to recoup the taxes.  We generate revenue from property taxes.  We are not in the real estate business. 

 

Mr. Hawkins stated that Central Alliance continues to tell us they do have prospects, and we don’t have a product to sell.  Ms. Powers advised Newberry County has missed out on some opportunities because we don’t have what they are looking for.  Companies are a lot more focused now on their bottom line.  Their time schedules are getting much shorter.  We have to be ready to go by finding property and doing the planning so that when companies come in, we have a plan in place.  This would be phased in based on the County’s ability to fund it.  We found a strong location, which is very attractive.  The problem with the location right now is it doesn’t have the infrastructure and planning in place to sell it.    

 

Mr. Waldrop stated the Water and Sewer Authority just ran a pressurized sewer line.  Ms. Powers advised we would need a pump station. 

 

Mr. Waldrop stated if somebody wanted to buy that property, they could put a pump station in when the need arises.  He felt we were speculating, but we need somebody else to go along with the County on the plan.  Mr. Waldrop stated he would not support this project.

 

Mr. Morris agreed that industry now wants to move in immediately, and that sometimes you have to spend money to make money.  If we don’t do something, we will only continue to increase the tax rates on the property owners of the County.  We have to get industry in the county and you sometimes have to take a risk to make things better.

 

Mr. Caldwell asked in the proposal to invest this type of money, what form of taxation is this going to change for the public and what about reassessment next year.  Mr. Hawkins didn’t know about reassessment but asked Mr. Pope to address what it would do to the taxpayers.

 

Mr. Pope stated it would shift some of the tax burden away from industry back onto the property taxpayers.  In order to have tax exempt status, you have to make certification that you are not buying this for a private party and do not have a contract in existence.   In order to maintain tax exempt status as we sell industrial tracts to private parties, we will pay down a pro rata part of the bonds.  It is a pay as you go idea.  In response to Mr. Caldwell’s question, it will have some affect on the public so long as there are bonds outstanding, but as we sell property, bonds will be paid back.  The industries will then come on line and pick up some of the burden and ultimately reduce the tax burden of the taxpayers in the long run.

 

Mr. Caldwell asked if there was any chance of this project becoming a second F.G. Wilson.  Mr. Pope advised the F.G. Wilson plant was built and they were paying taxes over the years so we didn’t lose money.  The first park paid for itself in a couple of years.  The City of Newberry did a study that said all of our contacts in Newberry come from the Columbia area.  This intersection is the one closest to Columbia suitable for development.  It is an ideal site and is already zoned industrial. 

 

Mr. Waldrop stated at one time there was a big sign on the Interstate for weeks and weeks of property for sale.  Mr. Hawkins said it was for twice the price we are talking about paying now. 

 

Mr. Caldwell asked Mr. Pope to amplify on the growth from Columbia and if the growth was jumping over Lexington.  Mr. Pope advised the interchanges around Lexington were filling up.  You have people looking for less restriction and more country life and a small town environment as we have in Newberry County. 

 

Mr. Caldwell stated the more development the more restrictions you will have. 

 

Mr. Hawkins’ understanding was if Council agreed to issue the bonds that would not mean we were agreeing to buy the property.  That will take a separate vote if Council decides to buy the property.  Mr. Pope stated that was correct; that this is just to do the financing.  Mr. Pope advised that the ordinance has to specify where the funding will be used.  There would have to be a draw schedule.  Right now the use of the money is limited to the northwest quadrant of that highway.  If you want to amend it, you could put in the general vicinity of that intersection.    

 

Mr. Hawkins asked if Council would like to reverse the order of the agenda and go into Executive Session to talk about the contractual matter and then come out and vote on issuing the bonds. 

 

Mr. Dawkins moved to go into Executive Session; second by Mr. Caldwell.  Vote was unanimous.

 

            Mr. Summer advised he had to leave at 4:00 p.m.

 

Mr. Hawkins stated in the spring of 2001 he advocated the hiring of an Economic Development Director, and it has taken us five years to get from there to where we are this afternoon.  Nobody wants this to happen any more than him, but he will not be rushed into a decision today because we have known for months that February 28 was the projected closing date on this project.  If we couldn’t put it together until today, we are going to take a deliberate approach and consider this and not be forced into a decision today.

 

Mr. Hawkins requested that everyone leave the room except County Council and the Acting Administrator.

[EXECUTIVE SESSION 3:04 P.M. – 4:57 P.M.

 

Councilmen Summer and Caldwell left during Executive Session.

 

Mr. Morris moved to return to regular session; second by Mr. Waldrop.  Vote was unanimous.

 

Mr. Hawkins advised lengthy discussions were held with persons who have contracts on the property for an Industrial Park and an offer was made to buy their contract. 

 

Mr. Morris requested that action be taken on the motion and second on the bond issue.

 

Mr. Dawkins moved to postpone third reading until the March 1, 2006 meeting; second by Mr. Morris.  Voting for the motion:  Councilmen Hawkins, Dawkins, Morris and Baker.  Councilman Waldrop abstained.  Councilmen Summer and Caldwell were absent.  Motion passed by majority vote.

 

Mr. Pope advised Council discussed extending a formal offer to Southeast Resort Holdings, LLC to take assignment of all six contracts that are set to close on March 3, 2006 at an offered price of $125,000, and the response was in the negative. 

 

Mr. Dawkins moved to put that into the public record; second by Mr. Morris.  Voting for the motion:  Councilmen Hawkins, Dawkins, Morris and Baker.  Councilman Waldrop abstained.  Councilmen Summer and Caldwell were absent.  Motion passed by majority vote.

 

1.1       Carter Goble Lee – Capital Sales Tax Projects.

 

Mr. Dawkins stated the County hired Carter Goble Lee to be the construction manager of the Sales Tax Projects in the County.  A question has arisen as to who pays Carter Goble Lee and if the funds come out of each project.  The fire departments and all of the projects are already constrained as far as the funding they have.  The Council did this after the fact, and after discussions with Mr. Klugh, Mr. Hawkins and Mr. Pope, this can be an expense of the Sales Tax.  The County may have to front it until we can get the interest money from the Sales Tax to reimburse the County.  Mr. Dawkins asked if the County could pay the fees to Carter Goble Lee rather than the fire departments or library, or whatever.

 

Mr. Hawkins so moved because we brought Carter Goble Lee on in the middle, and we need to find the money somewhere else besides the projects having to pay for them; second by Mr. Morris. 

 

Mr. Waldrop agreed but at the time Carter Goble Lee was not involved and their 3 ½% was not in the picture.  The projects will have an overrun anyway and with the 3 ½% it will be even more.  We need to make these projects go at the price decided and asked if the projects could be downsized and the 3 ½% be part of the final cost.  Mr. Dawkins advised the architects were working on trying to bring them into budget.   

 

Mr. Klugh advised Mr. Waldrop was talking about the 3 ½% being outside of that. 

 

Mr. Pope asked if it was the consensus of Council that there was not enough money in the budget to cover Carter Goble Lee’s fees and to consider it a cost overrun reimbursable from any extra proceeds from the Capital Project Sales Tax.  Mr. Hawkins indicated that was correct.    

 

Mr. Morris reminded Council that when Carter Goble Lee was hired they said they would review the projects, look at the drawings, and they could recoup their 3 ½% in savings from projects.  That adds even more to being able to put bucks into this project.

 

Mr. Hawkins called for the question.  Vote was unanimous.  (Councilmen Summer and Caldwell were absent)

 

1.2       Supplemental Appropriation for fire departments.

 

Mr. Dawkins stated in fiscal year 01-02 Council started assisting with funding of fire stations.  In fiscal year 04-05 the $100,000 committed to two fire stations was not rolled over.  Mr. Klugh and Debbie Cromer, Finance Director, found in the current budget $50,000 from two sirens we budgeted for $20,000 each and $10,000 out of the Board of Rural Fire Control building maintenance fund to fund one of the stations.  We would have to do a supplemental appropriation for the other $50,000. 

 

Mr. Dawkins read the following into the record:  In fiscal year 01-02 O’Neal Station received $50,000 and Maybinton received $30,000 because that’s all they requested;  02-03 $50,000 went to Little  Mountain station and $50,000 went to Stoney Hill; 03-04 $50,000 went to St. Phillips and $50,000 went to Peak; 04-05 Silverstreet should have gotten $50,000 and Lake Murray Public Safety $50,000 (that was the money that was not rolled over); the current year, 05-06, $50,000 is supposed to go to Consolidated and $50,000 to Prosperity fire station.  All of these past four stations are in the Sales Tax projects. 

 

Mr. Dawkins moved that a supplemental appropriation be done for $50,000 and confirming what was read into the record as far as Consolidated, Prosperity, Silverstreet and Lake Murray of designating for the record who gets that money; second by Mr. Hawkins. 

 

Mr. Dawkins explained that when he and Dave Waldrop proposed the projects to the Capital Sales Tax Committee, the project cost for Lake Murray was supposed to have been $695,000.  In their presentation they told the Committee that the County was chipping in $50,000 so we asked for $645,000. 

 

Mr. Hawkins believed it was Council’s intention every year that the $50,000 go to these departments, and somebody should have asked us if we wanted that money rolled over, and it did not happen. 

 

There being no further discussion, Mr. Hawkins called for the question.  Vote was unanimous.  (Councilmen Summer and Caldwell absent).

 

Leonard Sossamon asked permission to address Council, which was granted.  Mr. Sossamon advised that Henry Hood just advised that they would accept the $125,000 for the assignment.

 

Mr. Dawkins moved to go into Executive Session again to discuss this. 

 

Mr. Baker advised he had to leave.    

 

There being no second to Mr. Dawkins’ motion, Mr. Dawkins withdrew his motion for Executive Session and made the following motion in open session. 

 

Mr. Dawkins moved to make an offer of $125,000 total to buy the assignment of the contracts and the contracts will be signed over to Newberry County; second by Mr. Morris.  Voting for the motion:  Councilmen Hawkins, Dawkins, Morris and Baker.  Councilman Waldrop abstained.  (Councilmen Summer and Caldwell were absent).  Motion passed by majority vote.

 

Mr. Morris moved to give third reading to the bond issue as amended; second by Mr. Baker.    Voting for the motion:  Councilmen Hawkins, Dawkins, Morris and Baker.  Councilman Waldrop voted against the motion.  (Councilmen Summer and Caldwell were absent).  Motion passed by majority vote. 

 

Mr. Dawkins moved to adjourn; second by Mr. Morris.  Vote was unanimous. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:10 p.m.

 

                                                                       

NEWBERRY COUNTY COUNCIL

 

 

                                                                        ________________________________

                                                                        Mike Hawkins, Chairman

 

 

                                                                        __________________________________

                                                                        Susan C. Fellers

                                                                        Clerk to Council